THE CASE FOR A "BROWN NEGROID" CLASSIFICATION OF SUMERIANS: [Extinct races and racial reality. Hamitic races were African not European, so they should not be classified as Caucasoid.] The African nature of ancient people in Sumer and Ancient Egypt can be discovered through anthropological terms such as: - Dolicocephalic (horizontally long skull, not tall skull), - Prognathism (jaws jutting out from skull) - platyrrhine (wide nose) ------------------------------------------ SUMERIANS DISPLAY EURAFRICAN RACIAL TRAITS: "...First there is the Eurafrican... In ancient times, this type is found in Mesopotamia and Egypt and may be compared with the Combe Capelle skull. It is possibly identical with men who lived in the high desert west of the Nile in paleolithic times.." "...These people are of medium stature, with complexion and hair like those of the Eurafrican, to which race they are allied, dark eyes, and oval faces. They have small ill-filled dolichocephalic skulls, with browridges poorly developed or absent, bulging occiputs, orbits usually horizontal ellipses, broad noses, rather feeble jaws, and slight sinewy bodies..." [Penniman, T.K. "A note on the inhabitants of Kish Before the Great Flood," Excavations at Kish, 1923-33 Vol 4. pp 65-72] ...The first author who used both osteological data and iconography was Stephen Langdon. As early as in 1927 he concluded (also with use of Buxton’s data) that the city of Kish in Early Dynastic period was inhabited by the mixture of Semites and Sumerians represented by two dolichocephalic races identified by Buxton, namely the Euroafricans and the Mediterraneans. Later, in the period of Persian domination, the third Armenoid race also contributed to the local population... [Physical Anthropology and the "Sumerian problem",Arkadiusz Soltysiak, Studies in Historical Anthropology, vol 4:2004[2006],pp.147] ------------------------------------------ SUMERIANS HAD AN "EURAFRICAN MULATTO" APPEARANCE, EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT CONSIDERED MULATTOS. Sumerians and Ancient Egyptians were "brown negroid" populations that were becoming diluted by "pale Caucasoid" invader populations. So Sumerians and Ancient Egyptians eventually became extinct races. The Sumerians and Ancient Egyptian had an "Eurafrican mulatto" appearance , even though they were not considered mulattos. So Sumerians and Ancient Egyptians were established races/established nations with large populations: which means they were not considered mulattos, but still Sumerians and Egyptians had the modern "mulatto look". "Mulatto appearance" might be considered by some as caucasoid because mulattos have some caucasian features to their faces. But the racial reality of modern times is that mulattos are considered black,brown or coloured. So mulattos could be considered modern "brown negroids" because the racial reality is that they are not accepted as caucasian. So modern scientists should be honest and admit that SUMERIANS AND ANCIENT EGYPTIANS WOULD NOT BE ACCEPTED AS CAUCASIANS if they were alive today. So Sumerians and ancient Egyptians should not be classified as caucasoid. They should be classified as Brown Negroids: Negroid populations who have absorbed some caucasoid traits. ----------------------------------------- SUMERIANS ASSOCIATED HUMANITY WITH BLACK COLOUR (NOT WHITE). The Sumerians called themselves "SAG-GIGA" or "Black Headed People". The Sumerian word SAG refers to head, but SAG also has the implication of a person: i.e. If you count how many people, then you count how many heads there are. Or, if you count 10 heads, that means there are 10 people. SAG probably does not refer to hair, because Sumerians used various other words for hair (such as DILIB and SIKIPA). [Note also that Sumerians had shaven heads.So they were probably not describing their hair.] So SAG-GIGA could be understood to be mean "Black People", or people with dark skin. If we say that Sumerians were brown, does this information hint that the Sumerians considered themselves descended from a Black Race? Did the Sumerians consider themselves the offspring of Africans(Ethiopians?) Were the Sumerians the children of Nimrod Kingdom ? Were the Sumerians descendants of Havilah ? ------------------------------------------ EARLIEST CIVILIZED RACES WERE BLACK/BROWN, THEN BECAME WHITE. SUMERIANS AND ANCIENT EGYPTIANS ARE EXTINCT RACES that were among the BLACK/BROWN EARLIEST CIVILIZED RACES. Sumerians and Egyptians were negroid populations who were slowly absorbing Caucasoid genetics over thousands of years. The UNCIVILIZED CAUCASOID TRIBES were continually invading the NEGROID CIVILIZATIONS, over thousands of years. Race mixing(miscegenation) occurred in the fertile crescent over thousands of years: That is how Sumerians --became--> Chaldeans(Babylonians) --became--> modern Marsh Arabs: i.e. That is how Ethiopians-in-Asia --became--> Sumerians --became--> Chaldeans(Babylonians) --became--> modern Marsh Arabs. That is how Ancient Egyptians(non Arabs) --became--> Modern Egyptians(Arabs) So races who were originally Negroid were slowly becoming Caucasoid over thousands of years. We could say that the civilized negroid races were present but died out in the Fertile Crescent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MODERN EXAMPLES OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISHONESTY (ANTHROPOLOGICAL DISHONESTY): HOW EUROPEAN SCIENTISTS CLASSIFY MODERN ETHIOPIANS Modern scientists are trying to make Ethiopians "honorary Europeans" by classifying them as Caucasoid. This is laughable because Ethiopians are africans with dark skins. The "Racial reality" is that if an Ethiopian were present in racist southern USA during the segregation era, he would be labelled as a black person asked to sit in the back of the bus. The racial reality is that modern Ethiopians should be classified as negroids. [Ancient Ethiopians were certainly regarded as negroes (Jeremiah 13:23).] Wherever ancient civilization is connected to Africans, Europeans scientists pretend they were "honorary Europeans" by classifying their skulls as "Caucasoid". Ethiopians should not be considered Caucasoids, because Ethiopians are Black Africans. Ethiopians were Blacks Africans in ancient times,and Ethiopians are still Black African in modern times. Modern Ethiopians should be classified as negroids: whether they be Black Negroids, or modern Brown negroids, or Negroids who have absorbed some causoid genetics, they racial reality is that modern Ethiopians are not "honorary Europeans". Modern Ethiopians are negroids and should NOT be classified as caucasoids. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE NEED FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL HONESTY: EXTINCT RACES ARE NOT PRESENT IN THE MODERN WORLD, SO MODERN SCIENTISTS HAVE DECIDED TO LIE ABOUT THEIR ETHNICITY AND COLOUR. The "racial reality" is that if an ancient Sumerian were present in racist southern USA during the segregation era, he would be labelled as a black person asked to sit in the back of the bus. The "racial reality" is that if an ancient Egyptian were present in racist southern USA during the segregation era, he would be labelled as a black person asked to sit in the back of the bus. So archaeologists/anthropologists should classify Sumerians and ancient Egyptians as negroids: perhaps negroids that absorbed some caucasoid features over thousands of years. Hence the need for new classifications such as "Brown Negroids" for Sumerians. ============================================== return to main page: http://sumerdecoded.com/index_.htm